Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Should they change the name Hummingbird Pro to Hog Songwriter?


Watchdogg

Recommended Posts

Just was looking at Gibson.com Accoustic lineup and see they have the Hummingbird Pro listed. Very impressive specs (bone nut, bone saddle, hideglue, LR baggs, ect...) for one of there lower MSRP guitars.Having its predessesor the Hummingbird Artist which is essentially the same guitar in shortscale with tulip tuners I think it is a bargain. What I am curious about is why Gibson calls it a Hummingbird Artist/Pro instead of a mahogany Songwriter which it really is? Regardless, I love mine diffinitely has a different vibe than the rest of the Hog Gibson family, bright, sweet and jangly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that they are using the Hummingbird and J-45 name in these cases as these are iconic names, whereas Songwriter and J-50 have never achieved the same level of popularity regardless of how good they might be. It's a marketing issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that they are using the Hummingbird and J-45 name in these cases as these are iconic names, whereas Songwriter and J-50 have never achieved the same level of popularity regardless of how good they might be. It's a marketing issue.

 

Good point. The Hummingbird Artist shared a cherry burst with its namesake, so it does share some resemblence to its namesake. But the Pro? Neither sounds anything like the original Hummingbird. A really nice guitar at a great price deserves a more accurate, perhaps marketable name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit of a simpleton when it comes to these matters. For me, a Hummingbird has to be the traditional cherry sunburst and have the traditional pickguard. I a/b tested an MC against my SWD when I bought it and they were very different guitars indeed. I suspect they are the same shape, bracing, csale etc - correct me if I'm wrong.

 

The Pro looks to be an awesome guitar but I've not played one. But it does not "look" like a 'Bird, not that this matters one jot.

 

I like to think that the SWD was developed from the 'Bird heritage - square shouldered dread etc. But what difference does it make. Most people in the market will base their buying decision on tone, feel, smell, what it says to you when you play it etc. I really don't think the name of the model is that high up on the list. Maybe, maybe not.

 

I will have a Hummingbird one day though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit of a simpleton when it comes to these matters. For me, a Hummingbird has to be the traditional cherry sunburst and have the traditional pickguard. I a/b tested an MC against my SWD when I bought it and they were very different guitars indeed. I suspect they are the same shape, bracing, csale etc - correct me if I'm wrong.

 

The Pro looks to be an awesome guitar but I've not played one. But it does not "look" like a 'Bird, not that this matters one jot.

 

I like to think that the SWD was developed from the 'Bird heritage - square shouldered dread etc. But what difference does it make. Most people in the market will base their buying decision on tone, feel, smell, what it says to you when you play it etc. I really don't think the name of the model is that high up on the list. Maybe, maybe not.

 

I will have a Hummingbird one day though.

 

 

Another thing is the Pro might have been an adaptation of the Bird. GC might have said, make us x number of Birds but with these appointments for a lower price as an exclusive.

 

I agree though, the Bozeman group is known produces anomalies. The Super Dove is kind of an odd one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing is the Pro might have been an adaptation of the Bird. GC might have said, make us x number of Birds but with these appointments for a lower price as an exclusive.

 

I agree though, the Bozeman group is known produces anomalies. The Super Dove is kind of an odd one.

 

I had a '69 hummingbird the Pro and Artist are a different animals( although I now prefer the later). They do not share many specs except silka/mahogany the lower bout, bracing and even scale and color on the Pro are different.

 

Seems Gibson has many misnomers J guitars that are dreadnaught. SJ that either a jumbo or a dreadnaught, ect , ect. They even have Acknowleged the J/SJ confusion on there homepage. Shame, such a great product. Hopefully many are like me and buy the guitar that speaks to them instead of the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...