Guitarooster52 Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 There are lots of other great acoustic guitars out there. Why did you choose, or want to get a Gibson? Why not Martin, Taylor, L'Arrivee, Takamine, Blueridge..... I'm not out to be critical, I'd just like your honest thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lammataohc Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I am a first time gibson owner but I like 'em because it lets you dig in to the guitar without it breaking up. The sound does not change just the volume and I love that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayla Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 I really like the sound of Gibson acoustics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guth Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Quite a few different reasons: I'm primarily attracted to the tone that is uniquely Gibson. I love the sound that I've heard at live shows and via the recordings from a number of different artists: think Jackson Browne, Russ Barenberg, etc. - the list of singers & pickers could extend for quite a ways, not to mention numerous country blues artists. I also like the look of Gibson acoustics - I'm a big fan of sunbursts and the round shouldered designs. Gibson's history plays into the equation somewhat, but it's not nearly as important to me as the points mentioned above. I'm a sucker for a good Gibson and I've owned a number of different models over the past few years (all Bozeman examples from 1991 on): a J30, a J50, and a J35. I currently own a J45TV. That said, I don't consider myself a cheerleader for Gibson by any means. For the tone that I've been looking for, I feel like I've had to play at least twenty Gibsons for every one that truly appealed to me. I prefer a dry, punchy, woody, balanced tone. I don't like a low E that goes "thunk" or "thud" with no clarity at all, and I don't like trebles that lack presence or energy as you move up the neck or trebles that are too thin. I certainly don't like guitars that sound just plain lifeless. Too many Gibson acoustics that I've played over the past number of years fall into one or more of these categories. Those characteristics might work well for others, but its just not what I'm looking for. However, when I do manage to find a Gibson that meets my requirements, I feel that few other guitars can provide as much satisfaction to my ears, certainly given the price. There are quite a few great guitars being produced right now - each of them appealing to their own group of fans. The music that I prefer to create owes quite a bit to traditional, roots based genres including country blues and some older country music. For what I like, the Gibson sound just works. There are plenty of other guitars that I would also love to own, but I'll probably always have a soft spot for the Gibson tone. I was talking with a salesman at a Gibson dealer a few months ago. We were sitting in the store's high end showroom where a number of Gibsons reside along with some other models from smaller builders. He was playing a few of the guitars for me to listen to - I think he could have made just about any guitar sound heavenly. Many of those other guitars were very nice and I could understand the appeal if I were spending most of my time in alternate tunings, playing more modern fingerstyle music (for lack of a better expression, and I do create music like this as well). I think the salesman summed it up perfectly - after commenting on a boutique brand the store carried and noting how excited others in the store were about that brand he said "those other guitars are beautiful, but where are the meat and potatoes? They're just not what I'm after. Gibsons just have it." I couldn't have said it any better. All the best, Guth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Modac Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 My introduction to Gibsons was through pre war L-00s and the like, long before it became fashionable and costly to acquire them, and before all you get was somebody else's junk----for a ridiculous price. The reason I liked them was because they had more tonal coloration than Martins, and they were more malleable in my hands. I could play more expressively with them. Sadly, the vast tonal palettes of those old Gibsons are not always the case with some of the Montana guitars I've owned and tried. Happily, I have managed to find several that fairly held their own, in comparison with the the better old Gibsons I've owned and played. I like Martins too, and some of their imitators, as well. The Legend and TV series are a nice step in the right direction for Gibson.....not only are they guitars that look cool, but they actually sound like Gibsons are supposed to sound----which is not generally the case with most of the Montana models, though many of them surpass the 60s and 70s monstrosities Gibson was churning out, back then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guth Posted February 1, 2009 Share Posted February 1, 2009 Modac, Going back about twenty-plus years ago or so, I had a chance to purchase a few 30's era L-00s before the prices became too prohibitive. One or two examples were extremely tempting, but the size of the necks (thickness, not width) kept me out of the game. Great sounding guitars however. The tone of of those guitars definitely served to increase my fondness for Gibson acoustics. All the best, Guth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Dog Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I have played a lot of different brands of guitars, and none come close to Gibson for the sound I'm going for (Americana or Alt Country). I started playing guitar when I was around 21 or so. At the time, two good buddies played professionally (we were all friends with each other). One was a rock and roll drummer, but also a good country acoustic player. He had a 60's model Gibson 12-string. The other friend played bluegrass. He was the guitar player for The Outdoor Plumbing Company since age 15, and was good enough that he played onstage with Bill Monroe, The Seldom Scene, and others. His guitar was an original 1937 Martin D-28. I got to play both, and for me the Gibson always won out. But I don't play bluegrass. Both guys owned the best guitar for what they did. So I don't knock other brands. Hell, I keep wanting a Martin, Taylor, etc. etc., but when I play 'em and sing, there's just something about the Gibson that I love. It's like soul, or essence, or compatibility, or all of the above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANEYM305 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 The story behind my 1970 Gibson is pretty basic: I wanted to be unique. Most country artists play Martin's and I wanted to stand out from the crowd. Years ago, before I had even tested any acoustic guitars against eachother I knew that I wanted a vintage Gibson (vintage, because I heard it sounds warmer). I had spent most of my stage and studio time playing electric, so most of my resarch, time, and money had been spent on electric guitars and gear. When it came time to upgrade from my Takamine to something better, I sat down with a few Gibsons & Martins (old and new), and a few taylors and Epiphone Masterbilts. All of them dreadnoughts. I was in love after playing a '68 J-50! The Martins (new and old) had a great mid range tone. Great for anyone who plans on singing along and has a mid to high range voice. The Taylors, as you can probably guess, were to high and tinny sounding. Now, when it came to Gibson. The new Gibsons had a nice deep tone, but they were too crisp for me. the '68 I played was deep, and thick and rich! It was perfect for my baritone voice! I new that I had to have it... unfortunately I didn't have the money. Last week, at my local music store (I live in a small farming town with a rinky-dink music store) I found a (soon-to-be MY) 1970 Gibson J-50 they had just got in on a trade. The guitar looked and played nice, but sounded like crap. The strings hadn't been changed in years. Never-the-less, I acted on impulse. Went home, grabbed my Takamine, grabbed one of my American Strats, took out a couple hundred dollars from the bank, and made an offer on the crappy sounding/nice looking guitar. I went home that afternoon, swapped the old rusty strings out for some Elixer Nanowebs, and fell in love again! That rich, thick, warm, delicious tone that I heard from that '68 I played a few years ago, came rushing right back to me all at once... It's hard to describe how I felt when I strummed that first G chord. It was like I had done something wrong, like the sound coming out of the guitar I was holding, shouldn't have sounded that way... not that good! I was completely taken back by how large and full the sound was! ...It was beautiful! I have not put that guitar down at all this past week. I've played two shows this past week and spent about 10 hours in the studio, refusing to play anything but my acoustic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballcorner Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I think many of us play around with several brands. There are some people here who appear to exclusively play Gibsons, but if you look at their collections you see a wide range of tonal characteristics despite sticking to that single brand. I personally have a bit of everything, except Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustystrings Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I've owned lots of guitars and played even more. I've had the hard-core vintage stuff, old archtops, a '50s Martin, modern guitars, etc. My serious acoustics, though, tended to be old sunburst Gibsons, primarily an LG-2. The guitar that changed how I hear guitars was a battered, refinished c.1950 J-45 with two dozen repaired cracks. Nothing else compared after that. Still, I wasn't ready to go down that road, and I insisted on playing a modern Taylor - a nice, big 815C jumbo with the usual Taylor toothpick neck. Years passed. I trimmed the guitar lineup down to not much more than one acoustic, one electric, and a couple of old classicals. Then one day on a whim I lifted a J-45 off the wall of a Guitar Center. I was still raising it, hadn't even played a note on it, and the neck profile in my left hand just felt so RIGHT. Dead strings, terribly-setup nut, but it just whispered, "welcome home." The Taylor is gone. The Telecaster lies dreaming in its case. The classicals bide their time. Every time I play the J-45 I hear my own history with the guitar. Intellectually, I understand that there is no finer guitar for accompanying the human voice than a J-45/J-50/Southern Jumbo - but emotionally, it just feels like home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peiplayer Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I bought my first acoustic a Martin D28 in late 2005. Didn’t know anything about acoustics other than Martin and Gibson supposedly made good ones. Never heard of Taylor, Takamine, etc. Even though I preferred the look and sound of a J45 that the store had, I was talked into buying a D28 by the salesman who essentially said Gibsons were all c**p….a mantra I have heard repeatedly since. I never lost my preference and soon realized I had made a mistake. The Martin was a fine guitar, I just never bonded with it I guess. After a few months I traded for a new J45 at considerable loss, but I’m glad I did and have never regretted it. That doesn’t mean to say that now I would only play Gibson. Many of my playing pals have Martins, Yamahas, and I would play any of ‘em, I’m not that obsessively attached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
albertjohn Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I'm a bit of a marketing man's dream. As a youngster I was into playing brass instruments and thelectronic organ. All the musical instruments seemed to be Yamaha. When I took up the guitar my heros at the time (70s) were Santana and Phil Manzanera - both Yamaha SG2000 players - start of GAS! Then I discovered The Who so for acoustics it had to be Gibson. Even though I'm yet to get an SJ200. I just wanted to sound like the intro to Pinball Wizard or Behind Blue Eyes. When I could afford one, I'd decided that a 200 was too big so went for a dread sized guitar. No regrets. But...... "One day, it shall be mine!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Player Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I love the tonal difference my Gibson gives me. I obviously love my Taylor's too, but chose the AJ because it was everyting a Taylor is not, plays well for fingerstyle and strumming and just looks like what I expect an awesome Dreadnaught to look like. (I prefer slope shoulders to square). I wanted to like Martins, but found them dull, lifeless and boring when played next to my Taylor... When I picked up the AJ and played it, it was love..... I knew it was definately not a Taylor sound but it works for everything that I don't play on my Taylors and has taken some songs away that I normally would play on a Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stumps Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I recently finished an exhaustive search for my ultimate guitar. I went through several mental/attitude phases of the search, and out of frustration I settled on two concepts - 1) I am an acoustics man, so I quit looking at electrics, and 2) I was purposefully going to remove $$ from the equation. I wanted to find what sounded best for me, and then worry if I could afford it after I found it. Now, a bit about me. I'm 40, been playing for 25 years - the last 18 exclusively acoustic. I don't have time to play in bands, it's all for my own pleasure and any family who wishes to listen. I listen to nearly every kind of music, and I gravitate toward anything authentic - so I don't care for pop music or anything that sounds like a production board made it rather than musicians. I play folk, rock, bluegrass - artists on my set list include eagles, grateful dead, johnny cash, john denver, simon and garfunkel, bill monroe and doc watson. I'm probably 60% flatpicking and 40% fingerpicking. So now that that is out of the way... my selection process when like this: Started looking at Martins and Taylors. I tried 8 or 9 Martins in the $2800 - $3500 range (store price, not list. I tried a few more Taylors, maybe over 10 models, the most expensive was $4000 out the door. I also tried a few Breedloves, Guilds, and a few smaller companies like Huss and Dalton. Where I live, there aren't many Gibson dealers, so I was 3 months into the shopping phase before I made it in to try a Gibson. All I can tell you is that when I picked up the Gibson Songwriter Deluxe Studio, at the first chord my heart ached. As i played I thought to myself "wow, I never knew I played so well!" I played that guitar for 30 minutes. I put it down, played a few more, circled back to it, same thing again, the sound just blew me away -clear ringing highs, pure, warm rumbles and purrs from the lows. Now to be fair to Gibson, I had already tried 3 other Gibsons that were more money than the Songwriter, but this guitar was just perfect for me. Having said all that, I firmly believe that for each player there really is an ultimate guitar. In the Gibson I know I have found mine, but that doesn't mean that the Gibson Songwriter Deluxe Studio is the best guitar ever made, it's the best one for me. You might pick one up and play it and not notice anything special. So, I don't believe that the Gibson guitar is the best, I think Taylors and Martins and a few others are fine guitars, but the reason I picked the Gibson over them is because the sound was exactly what I wanted, and it's the only guitar that gave me that sound. I'll throw in here that many folks in this board seem to have collections of guitars. To be honest, with 4 kids I knew that this guitar purchase was going to be my one and only, so it's my one true guitar. I think someone with a collection of guitars might have a different perspective to offer you. My two cents... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wonderful remark Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 because he did.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hall Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 I don't care if it's ACME, if it is crafted well, sounds good and plays to the touch. I have old and new Gibsons, Martins and a fine Taylor among the crowd. I just like guitars, and the older one might be, the happier I will probably be as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 For me, it's all about the sound. And all I know is that the Gibson sound works for the music I like to play. (traditional old time) Martins are nice, and have many qualities that I like, but they don't hit all the buttons like a good Gibson. I could go on and on about the comparative qualities of tone, sustain, balance, etc, but why bother? You all know what I'm talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hall Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Sure do. Whatever makes one happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Player Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 because he did.. Hopefully you trim your ends a bit shorter though........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hall Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 Hopefully you trim your ends a bit shorter though........ :- Naw. Lets go back to that. Worked so well for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd Wilson Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 They just sound better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maninblack Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 because he did.. He is why I bought my first J-45. He is actually why I bought my last. (a 46 J-45 - as close as I could get to that 46 J-50 he's got in the picture). In the meantime I fell in love with the tone and feel of many others. As an aside, Bob is also the main reason I started smoking. A bad habit to be sure, but certainly cheaper than Gibsons. (I am now over 2 years cig free and directing all that extra $$$ toward picks and strings) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grampa Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 My first "good" guitar was a Gibson classical and when I started looking for steel strings I wanted a Gibson because of my history with them. Plus I knew players who had one, my brother specifically had a "Bird. Most steel string guitars had too narrow of string spacing for a classical player like me but the F-25 that I found has that classical 2" nut so I was in heaven. This for me is the ultimate guitar. It's got that Gibson sound and I can fit my fingers on and around the strings without any problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojo312 Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 hello everybody... When I was just 18 and could barely play a G chord I was working at the local music store...sweeping up, polishing instruments and delivering pianos, wheew! One day some guy came in with a bunch of old Gibson guitars and wanted to sell them all. I strummed on the cheapest one, $400.00. I was to new to guitars to remember the model, but it was a square shoulder all black guitar with alot of wear around the lower sound hole. It sounded so sweet and mellow I have never forgotten it. Even then I wished I had $400.00 ! I didn't look much at the others he had because they were all more money, I should have paid more attention I guess. Anyway............I have a OM18V martin that I truely love BUT...I wanted that Gibson sound. I settled a few years ago for a 2003 J50 used at $1200.00. It has since been set up, played alot and is my go to guitar now! I am always looking and must say I like the Montana ones alot. I can't afford a real old well set up Gibson but I am haveing a good time making mine a future well played old Gibson that sounds so so sweet! Jp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TM Posted February 2, 2009 Share Posted February 2, 2009 He is why I bought my first J-45. He is actually why I bought my last. (a 46 J-45 - as close as I could get to that 46 J-50 he's got in the picture). In the meantime I fell in love with the tone and feel of many others. I am selling this one that is as close to a script logo as you can get. I have seen only a handful of the Script logo J-50 they must not have made many. sorry for the big pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.