Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Ten Reasons Why The Stones Are Overrated


Recommended Posts

10. Paul is dead while Keith only looks like it.

9. It took 5 guys to make that awful noise, The Beatles only needed 4.

8. They never had a broadway show called stonemania.

7. Lead singer looks like Don Knotts.

6. Stole their name from some overrated music magazine.

5. Let it Bleed had nothing to do with Keifs liver.

4. Zipper never really worked right on my copy of Sticky Fingers.

3. Left out important ingredients for Goat's Head Soup.

2. Mick can't sing.

and the #1 reason.......

1. Yoko never stalked any of them. (Cue Late Night Band)

 

Posted this awhile back on the epi forum thought it fit with the Beatles vs. Stones thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rolling stones kick the beat-less *** any day of the year, with their hands tied back and blindfolded.

 

Only a guy like lennnon would have such lower standards and the stomach to **** Yoko

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rolling stones kick the beat-less *** any day of the year' date=' with their hands tied back and blindfolded.

 

Only a guy like lennnon would have such lower standards and the stomach to **** Yoko[/quote']

 

Ok, I get it. DemOOn you can change your nick back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why do we need ten reasons when i can give you ten bands that are better. no apparent order.

1) Led Zeppelin

2) The Beatles

3) Cream

4) The Yardbirds

5) Deep Purple

6) Santana

7) Buddy Holly and the Crickets

8) Frank Zappa (had many different band members)

9) Lynyrd Skynyrd

10) Boston

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw then in 1982 on there "farewell" tour. Somebody asked me, "Was it good because it was good or was it good because it was the Stones?" and I thought hmm. I love Mick Taylor era Stones and the earlier stuff, but it's time now to throw in the towel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...