djroge1 Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 I need to have a logo made for my amps and I cannot decide which one to use. Here they are... Please provide your input. Logo 1: Logo 2: Logo 3: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConMan Posted August 19, 2010 Share Posted August 19, 2010 All I can tell you is stick with clarity. I can't tell you how many copyrighted/trademarked names I've heard butchered. People don't understand it, or mis-read it for some reason and it sticks. Cool lettering, odd fonts and unique spellings can really confuse people. I want the name to be instantly recognized by Kindergarteners. After all, they are your future customers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeVeeWee Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 All I can tell you is stick with clarity. I can't tell you how many copyrighted/trademarked names I've heard butchered. People don't understand it, or mis-read it for some reason and it sticks. Cool lettering, odd fonts and unique spellings can really confuse people. I want the name to be instantly recognized by Kindergarteners. After all, they are your future customers... Neo, If you're not a marketeer yet, congrats for sharing your insights! As a pro marketeer I can't add a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LPguitarman Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 I like #3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichCI Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 What Neo said. I meant to vote for number 2 but voted for number 3 by mistake. I prefered 2 as it was more readable than 3 and I would put even a little more space between the "t" and the "l" - not a lot, just a little separation and also drop the word "Tone" down a bit so that the tail of the "e" at the end of "Apostle" isn't totally covered. I like all of them but the first one looks a little 70's and dated. The other two have a more modern style to them that I think would be more appealing to younger consumers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbabig Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 What Neo said. I meant to vote for number 2 but voted for number 3 by mistake. I prefered 2 as it was more readable than 3 and I would put even a little more space between the "t" and the "l" - not a lot, just a little separation and also drop the word "Tone" down a bit so that the tail of the "e" at the end of "Apostle" isn't totally covered. I like all of them but the first one looks a little 70's and dated. The other two have a more modern style to them that I think would be more appealing to younger consumers. you can delete your votes now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichCI Posted August 20, 2010 Share Posted August 20, 2010 Huh! Thanks, Kimbabig; I guess they didn't make that giant "Delete" button big enough for me. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibson4life Posted August 21, 2010 Share Posted August 21, 2010 I like Logo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retrosurfer1959 Posted August 22, 2010 Share Posted August 22, 2010 I like the concept on 3 but I would drop the lower t in tone and use the cross for the t in both words then get rid of scrunching and overlap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retrosurfer1959 Posted August 22, 2010 Share Posted August 22, 2010 I like the concept on 3 but I would drop the lower t in tone and use the cross for the t in both words then get rid of scrunching and overlap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.