Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Way to Go Epiphone: My New Sheraton II


ISirius42

Recommended Posts

I bought a Sheraton II in 1995--one that was probably built by Samick. It was my first "real" guitar purchase. Not knowing much, I didn't shop around, but I liked the look of the natural finish, five piece neck, and the inlays blew me away. As time when by and I learned more about guitars, I began regretting my purchase. The intonation was awful, the top was sanded down so much the second piece of plywood showed through in a couple of spots, the painted on binding on the headstock was sanded off in places, the pickguard was cheap and flimsy, the gold hardware constantly tarnished, and so on. After three setup jobs, the intonation was finally fixed. I upgraded the pickups and the harness, as well as the tuners. The changes made it nice but couldn't fix the basic construction issues. As time went by, it slowly sunk to the b- then c-list of my guitars and began collecting dust in my closet. After all of that, I still liked the idea of the Sheraton--the beautiful inlays, maple neck with mahagony accent, and the idea of natural wood on a jazz/blues guitar. Over the years, I would always pick up a Sheraton when I came across one, but there were always issues, which, truthfully, made me feel better about my Sheraton. When I saw that Epiphone had moved production to China I checked them out. I thought the quality improved, but they got rid of the five piece neck! I thought that signaled the end of the guitar line.

 

Well, while walking through our local Guitar Center this weekend, I passed by a natural Sheraton II. The first thing that caught my eye, was an intersting, subtle grain on the natural top. Then I saw a "Clearance" sticker on it. I snickered at first and thought, "It has a dent or they can't get rid of it." On my second pass through, I decided to pick it up and look at the back of the neck (I don't know why) I was expecting it to be a solid maple neck as I've seen over the last year or so. What I saw was a beautiful five piece neck and a sticker saying "Made in Korea" Not only was it a five piece neck, the middle piece of maple had tiger strips from top to bottom! The craftsmanship was excellent--no dings or gashes. It had a registration form date of Nov 28, 2012. The setup was perfect for my taste (as good or better than the two PLEKed Gibson 359s that I have gotten brand new!). After being lost in the joy of playing for half an hour and realizing a personal dream come true (that is, holding the guitar that I wanted my 1995 Sheraton to be), my wife told me, "Take the puppy home." Next thing I know, I was heading out of the store with my NEW Sheraton II. Not only is it a beautiful guitar, it has a great setup, great sound, and is a joy to play. Great job on making a very nice guitar, Epiphone. Strive to maintain that level of quality.

 

Sorry if this was a boring story, but I'm so excited about the new guitar that I had to share with people who would understand my feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I also saw one of these not too long ago. Might be that Epiphone needed to get more Sheratons pumped out than the factory in China could handle, so the Unsung factory in Korea got the nod for another run.

 

I've also recently seen Chinese Sheratons with five piece necks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Sheri

NewSheri_zps3608d8a7.jpg

 

New Sheri neck (Note the tiger stripe in the center piece of wood that goes from top to bottom!)

NewNeck_zps95800b28.jpg

 

Old Sheri neck

OldNeck_zps4981a302.jpg

 

New Sheri headstock (No painted-on faux-binding)

NewHead_zps7002bf15.jpg

 

Old Sheri headstock (Note that there are openings in the faux-binding that were there when I got it)

OldHead_zps1a3310aa.jpg

 

I'm looking forward to when the new Sheri begins to get the same golden glow as the old one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contgratulations, on your purchasing, an outstanding Epiphone guitar model! [thumbup]

 

One thing, I find interesting, is that the "new" Korean Sheri's, still use the old Samsung

Body configuration/outline, as opposed to the more historically correct "Gibson" ES-335-355

body specs, that the Chinese version, has had for several years, now. I suppose Epiphone

allows that, so the Korean factories don't have to "re-tool" to do that, thus keeping the

costs (to Epiphone) down. They don't seem to be any more (or less) expensive, regardless

of body shape, to us, the consumer.

 

Very Interesting...but, a Great guitar, none the less!

 

CB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...