Murph Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 Has been misunderstood lately. As a leader of the free World, I wish her the best. Murph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSG_Standard Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 If you were really a Liberal, you'd be tired of her Shenanigans and Twitchy Lying Face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky4 Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 She's just dreamy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mick Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 Eye think she's from Brazil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSG_Standard Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mick Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConMan Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Yeah, after she saw the light and allied herself with the Bush administration the Dems turned cannibal... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Yeah' date=' after she saw the light and allied herself with the Bush administration the Dems turned cannibal...[/quote'] Not at all. She lied about it. That is, She's lying about it. If she said she was persuaded out of fear or even stupidity to approve torture, then she should have said so. Lie about a matter of state, and you just need to get out. (Lie about doing a Fat Chick so your wife doesn't find out and I'll just make fun of you. Bill, You sleazy Sax Player, you). It's not a matter of Supporting you team no matter what. It's a matter of populating our government with qualified representatives we can rely on when things get heavy. A duty Republicans tend to shuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mick Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Then there is the fact she's a *****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homz Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Prosecute her with the rest of the torture monkeys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MReynolds Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 She's just another lying sack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSG_Standard Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Nancy is part of the Tripod of Stupidity that's keeping America afloat right now, what happens to the tripod if Nancy goes down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoConMan Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Only one way to get the truth out of that dumb b!tch... WATERBOARD HER!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSG_Standard Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Only one way to get the truth out of that dumb b!tch... WATERBOARD HER!!!! That would be torcher!:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Is Dead In My Basement Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 That would be torcher!:D Where is the fire. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homz Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Only one way to get the truth out of that dumb b!tch... WATERBOARD HER!!!! Waterboarding is probably torture(legal experts will decide if they have a case). Although I personally might get some pleasure waterboarding her and the rest of the chain of command that authorized waterboarding it would still be a possible legal infraction and thus I'm against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homz Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Where is the fire. The one who caries the torch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 I prefer Torchist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSG_Standard Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Waterboarding is probably torture(legal experts will decide if they have a case). Although I personally might get some pleasure waterboarding her and the rest of the chain of command that authorized waterboarding it would still be a possible legal infraction and thus I'm against it. Brilliant! =D> I'm against it, but I'd love to do it somebody else, for them doing it to somebody else... I can't wait to be on your team Homz! =D> =D> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homz Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Brilliant! =D> I'm against it' date=' but I'd love to do it somebody else, for them doing it to somebody else... I can't wait to be on your team Homz! =D> =D> [/quote'] You should read the post. I said I am against it. That was my final word on the matter. It is probably illegal. Everyone who partook in it top to the bottom should be arrested if it is found to be illegal by the experts. BTW I say probably and legal experts because I really don't want to see your 'function 8' key in action. That's the one you have set up with the copy/paste from some BS source where you try to prove that it isn't illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Brilliant! =D> I'm against it' date=' but I'd love to do it somebody else, for them doing it to somebody else... I can't wait to be on your team Homz! =D> =D> [/quote'] Didn't you catch the restraint. He'd like to, but won't because it's Wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSG_Standard Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Didn't you catch the restraint. He'd like to' date=' but won't because it's Wrong. [/quote'] Like I said it was brilliant. Did you catch the part where I said he'd "love to" instead of he "would"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homz Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Didn't you catch the restraint. He'd like to' date=' but won't because it's Wrong. [/quote'] He's a sociopath. Ego padding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted May 18, 2009 Share Posted May 18, 2009 Like I said it was brilliant. Did you catch the part where I said he'd "love to" instead of he "would"? So we should all give in to our Barbaric Tendencies and call it right? We should let out inner caveman determine the proper course of action? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.