zigzag Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I am going to mic my amp thru a USB port to my PC. I considered a Shure SM57 with a USB adaptor, but then someone recommended a Samson C01U. Anyone have a preference or a better suggestion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bill Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I use this and love it. http://www.bluemic.com/snowball/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riverside Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 The only cabs I try to mic are my Leslies - and that's a whole 'nother topic. As with anything, try a few and see what works. Then enter into the world of "pointed at the cone" or "pointed at the back", or... well, you get the idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dub-T-123 Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I use an SM57 pointed to the side of the speaker. Not directly at the cone. If you ask me technical questions about why I do it that way I wouldn't be able to answer you. It's just something I started doing and liked. I like the SM57 just fine but there are better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bill Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I also use the SM57 at times but I prefer the Blue Snowball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Californiaman Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 For recording: The Studio Projects LSD2 Condensor Mic. Great reviews about the mic. $600.00. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigzag Posted July 23, 2010 Author Share Posted July 23, 2010 Yeah, thanks Californiaman, but I probably should have mentioned that I was going to try to stay under $200; under $150 would be even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Californiaman Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Sure SM-57. Used by musicians the world over. Can't count how many times I've micd a cabinet with one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobB Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 The SM-57 has been the go to mic for live and recording applications for years. Tried and true.............hard to go wrong using it to mic an amp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon S. Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 The SM-57 has been the go to mic for live and recording applications for years. Tried and true.............hard to go wrong using it to mic an amp. +1. I've always used the SM-57, and it works great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVOL! Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I like the MD421 over the SM57 or 58, but it is out of your price range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainNemo68 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I use a CM67, which is Carvin's version of the SM57 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WahKeen Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I'm not sure I feel comfortable with something pointed at my cone... But I do want a SM57 for sure. *cough* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 SM57's are durable and work great. However, Sennheiser and Heil make the most transparent sounding mics I've ever heard. The Sennheiser E609 and 906 are wonderful Cabinet Mics, and the Heil PR35 is the best Mic I've ever owned, Hands Down. Great Vocal Mic, Great for Sound Reinforcement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigzag Posted July 27, 2010 Author Share Posted July 27, 2010 Tell me little about a large diaphragm in a mic, versus a smaller one, and and how that affects the nearness of the mic to the speakers and distortion and such? Which is better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDK Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 I typically use a Sennheiser e609, although I do have a SM-57 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazzboy Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 I typically use a Sennheiser e609' date=' although I do have a SM-57[/quote'] Big plus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVOL! Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 I typically use a Sennheiser e609' date=' although I do have a SM-57[/quote'] Have never used one, but was checking them out on line. Very nice. Says they are modeled after an MD series mic. Looks like I need to invest in one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVOL! Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 Tell me little about a large diaphragm in a mic' date=' versus a smaller one, and and how that affects the nearness of the mic to the speakers and distortion and such? Which is better?[/quote'] I prefer large diaphragm when using condenser mics because 1. they are more sensitive 2. the field of sound they capture is larger (bigger sweet spot) Small diaphragm mics tend to have higher dynamic range and a better sweet spot. They are great if your sound source is small, focused, and does not move; like a small guitar amp. Where you get the biggest payoff with a large diaphragm is acoustic instruments. Think of an acoustic guitar. You get booming bass right out of the sound hole, rich highs from the top, and jangle from the strings around the 14th fret. Try capturing that wide sound scape with a small diaphragm condenser. You can't. It's too surgical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschory Posted July 27, 2010 Share Posted July 27, 2010 Here's a shootout I found between the e609 and the SM57. Definitely doesn't beat playing with both on your own, which I'm hoping to do, but I think it's an interesting place to start: Thanks for all the input here guys. I've been thinking about what mic to get too, and you've helped a bunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.