E-minor7

Doesn't sound like retirement to me - have a splendid night

Yes, agree, , , and that's probably the main kick about these releases. Of course the overall picture is a bit of a ride as well. I like Flying a lot - especially the funky tremo-start. That said, I felt it fell apart in the CD-stereo-mix. In fact like a severe part of the entire early digi-MMT, which I heard in cans in a studio-shack back in the early winter of 1992. I sense you're a serious fan, Pepper. .

Tough, , , , and wider known it would probably fuel the lust for entering the genre. Apart from that I actually support the thought of placing it in a category of its own. But it has to be done in a friendly and respectful way. Talent will spring when talent springs. . I for 1 would have liked to hear such concert. Does old footage exist. .

You thereby crystalize my challenge. Another good Q. "The world is a drum kit" E-minor7 approx 1990

❄️ ❄️ * ❄️😲*

But I challenge you as Beatle-fan. Let's go in the cans and listen to Walrus. Then when the outro starts and begin to fade raise a finger when it's no longer music. On 7 other seats with similar headphones we invite F. Zappa, G. Martin, P. Glass, L. Anderson, L. Reed, N. Young and R. Zimmerman.

Certainly depending on my mood. . When bein' in the avantgarde corner, I can hear music from the shunting trains. .

Cheers. . . 🍻

Eeehh, yes, Burst. The next Q is whether it has nylon or metal-blades. .

A CD recommended by a co-player : The Hazards of Love by The Decemberists. A darn fine shot at updated yet traditionalistic dramatic folk-rock anno 2009.

Well, , , don't listen too tight to the schools'n'teachers. They are often behind and late out. That said I tend to agree - rap etc. is only half-music, , , and shows (as Keith Richards have stated recently) how many people are actually tone-deaf and in order to ride the vibe go for the fashion-trend rather than a conventional musical emotional/intellectual/spiritual exchange. But at this point we need to define melody, harmony, rhythm. Is the bird's song fx melody ? Is disharmony basically to be counted as (distorted/disturbed ) harmony ? Are the rail-shunting trains A or B ? Are we aware of steadfast rhythm contra rhythm, mechanical pulse contra organic pulse ? Thanx for the wind-synth guidance. Will look further into this.

Not really my experience - a number of young girls still act like they wanna, not go home with me, but catch my attention. As if they instinctively would like to be noticed and appreciated by an old musketeer. .

So many it came close to smashing his reputation in the looong run. . Apart from that, listen to his spare-time-album with Small Faces bass-player Ronnie Lane. Excellent stuff - in fact smaching. .

Thanx for the insight. No matter what it's bad style to smash a guitar, , , , or any other instrument for that matter. .

Have the feeling Lennon heard this. . .

Okay, we had B. Hope under the wig above. Here he goes again - this time in hotter company. Tells a lot - the White had to be covered. But cheesy it's not reluctant to be. .

Ok, I see -😸 and agree. The camp knows what it does. And actually represents some level of moral or high standard which seems to slip in so many other fields of modern reality. In that sense the Fab-center (cash-machine or not) still plays an important role in contemporary life'n'culture.

Revolver's already out - Rubber Soul is in the mold. Well, I like the old mixes refreshed/mastered. New mixes are risky territory - and the Fab-camp knows it. Because of that they most of the time appear to be acceptable. Some of them reveal new details on the tracks, , , slightly different possibilities. And sure, the latter is dangerous and must be restricted/prohibited in the future. .

Sounds great - hope you'll be able to keep your musical soul'n'spirit intact in the whirlwind of tonal activities. Btw. what is a wind synthesizer ? And apart from that my Q was about your thoughts as sax-player on The Beatles' use of saxophone.

Eehh, , , it's the the second time it appears in this thread. I now wait for the psychedeli c version. . .

^ 🍏

Jearrrhh - him Winston could be so cruel. .

They were right. Not sure if he was one of few, but Starr was immaculately good. Yet not a typhoon which became more and more attractive plus minus 1970 and onwards.

Absolutely - and this is probably 1963. Never seen this particular shot before. My father came home with the She Loves You/I'll Get You single for me and they wore the same lapel-less suits on the front. Don't forget the ultra-kool mid-phase btw. The looser or freer not yet hippie-style 1965-66.

😆 Out on thin ice there. Guess the Fabs laughed their caps off. .