Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Headstock shapes


lostindesert

Recommended Posts

I see Samick "LesPauls" at the Guitar shows' date=' that sell for $299 (vs. $499-699 for Epiphone), that

look pretty similar to Epiphones. Mind you, I wouldn't put my $ down for one, over an Epiphone, since for my $, a Les Paul is best made by Gibosn or Epiphone. By the same token, I wouldn't buy

a Johnson Strat or one of the other look-alikes. [/quote']

 

Please excuse my ignorance. Isn't this an Epiphone? Korean made Samick?

 

EpiphoneLesPaul012.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Someone, and I forget who, said the Epiphone pegheads longer than the Gibson, I've found it's (Epiphone) shorter, and a little thicker than the Gibson. Of course, it could just be the Korean variants, I dunno.

300826700.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lerxst Wrote:

"They used to be... Not for long, though.. But they did make Squires in the Mexican factory at one time.."

 

I know that they made some darn nice ones at the Cort Factory in Korea!!!

 

DCFC0004.jpg

And note the smaller headstock,this one is from 96.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone' date=' and I forget who, said the Epiphone pegheads longer than the Gibson, I've found it's (Epiphone) shorter, and a little thicker than the Gibson. Of course, it could just be the Korean variants, I dunno.[/quote']

 

G&F, I based my measurements on the HS off a '65 SG, which measures 6 3/4" from the top of the nut (i.e. the nut is not part of the measurement) while it looks as though Epi HS's are more like 7 1/16" long.

 

65head.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like all the Epiphone HS shapes, EXCEPT the SG and Les Pauls. Probably done initially to greatly

differentiate from Gibson. But, probably not necessary nowdays. My opinion? The HS in the avatar

on the left.....to me, that's the vintage Epiphone shape. Should be on more models - certainly the

SG and Les Paul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PJ - This is the 4th post (maybe 5) in this thread that you have stated that you do not like the headstock on the SG and LP. Give it a freakin rest already. How many times must you make the same point? Once or twice is fine, but after that, you're just annoying.

And why do I make this judgemental comment?

Because I happen to like the headstock. I like it MUCH better than the gibson. But do I tell you this over and over and over?! No, I wouldn't have even mentioned it if you hadn't had the feeling that once again you must tell us your feelings on that subject.

We all know how you feel about it.

If you don't like it, don't buy it. Because I really don't think they're going to change it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PJ - This is the 4th post (maybe 5) in this thread that you have stated that you do not like the headstock on the SG and LP. Give it a freakin rest already. How many times must you make the same point? Once or twice is fine' date=' but after that, you're just annoying.

And why do I make this judgemental comment?

Because I happen to like the headstock. I like it MUCH better than the gibson. But do I tell you this over and over and over?! No, I wouldn't have even mentioned it if you hadn't had the feeling that once again you must tell us your feelings on that subject.

We all know how you feel about it.

If you don't like it, don't buy it. Because I really don't think they're going to change it. [/quote']

 

:- Calling someone annoying isn't judgemental. Dont just rip on somone because they have a different opinion than you, show some class, ya big baby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The man who started this topic want's to say........I like the Epiphone headstock on their own models.

But if you're making a replica (sailboat,sportscar or guitar) it should look like the real deal.

Les Paul's, Dot's, sg's and other GIBSON models look imho better with the original headstock.

Just the way I see it, don't expect other Gibson and Epiphone lovers to think the same way.

 

Greetings,

 

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Epaminondas Stathopoulo.

 

This is one of the reasons I don't like the standard Epi headstock:

 

eehead.jpg

 

...see how they had to install the two top tuners all crooked so that the knobs wouldn't knock into the sides? BAD design. Also, FWIW, the curvature of the sides is too pronounced and esthetically displeasing; it lacks subtlety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on what should be done with headstocks:

 

Les Paul, SG, Flying V, Explorer, Firebird, etc. should have the same headstock as their Gibson counterparts.

 

Casino, Riviera, Sheraton, and all the other Epiphone originals should have a different Epiphone headstock... just like they do now.

 

Elitist and Masterbilt guitars should actually switch designs - Masterbilt guitars have the current Elitist headstock (which looks so much like the vintage Masterbilt), and Elitist should have the Gibson/Epiphone cross-breed.

 

I'm sure some people would prefer the Elitist Dot, Les Paul, SG, etc. to have a Gibson headstock, but there should be some difference between the Elitist and the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...