NeoConMan Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Rod Stewart has just had his 8th child - at the age of 60. Looks like he'll always have a band and a fan club, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbreslauer Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 who's the father? sorry, couldn't resist... :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoyVader Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 who's the father? Good one.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Correction...His wife had a baby...he had 30 sec.s of pleasure.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pippy Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 LOL! What a bunch of cynics y'all are! Good for him, say I. And I, for one, wish them all 'Health, Wealth and Happiness". P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duende Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Rod Stewart has just had his 8th child - at the age of 60. Looks like he'll always have a band and a fan club, eh? That man just keeps suasaging and sausaging Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieman15061 Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Rod Stewart has just had his 8th child - at the age of 60. Looks like he'll always have a band and a fan club, eh? No just bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Versatile Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Rod continues to have a charmed life Always good to see perform And interviews well too.... V Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfpup Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 More power to him! I know having a new baby in our house has made me feel almost young again (at 47). Bet he's feeling good. Of course he can afford lots of nanny's and whatnot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Searcy Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 I just wish him and Jeff Beck would make a new record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfpup Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 I just wish him a Jeff Beck would make a new record. Oh, h*ll yeah! Instead of the crooner crap Rod's been doing forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Searcy Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Yea, the first time he did it I thought..."Ok... it's cool he's paying respect to his influences...." After about the 4th all I could say was.."WHY?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Yea, the first time he did it I thought..."Ok... it's cool he's paying respect to his influences...." After about the 4th all I could say was.."WHY?" Maybe he likes that kind of music..Like when Jimi Hendrix told a interviewer he wanted to be the next Sinatra... Rod is at a place in his career where he can record what he wants to..he has nothing to prove and unlike many rockers he seems to be comfortable in his own skin...if he wants to cover Caruso he can and no record producer has the juice to stop him....In that regard he reminds me of Ray Charles who after establishing himself as a R&B artist went into Rock, Country & Western and anywhere he wanted to... Good for him and good for us....both of these artist have the capacity do bring their fan base to appreciate a form of music they other wise would never listen to.... Personally I am glad there is more then one form of music in this world..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Searcy Posted February 18, 2011 Share Posted February 18, 2011 Rod's free to do what ever he likes but I'm not going to be impressed with his next record if it a bunch of Tony Bennett covers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Rod's free to do what ever he likes but I'm not going to be impressed with his next record if it a bunch of Tony Bennett covers. Beverly Sills? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilliangirl Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Well, I'm sure I'll be criticized for this opinion but the whole thing seems a bit selfish to me. Did he give any thought to the child in this situation? So when Rod is 70, his kid is going to be 10. Is that fair? Basically, the kid is growing up without a father. And for what? So that Rod can prove he's still 'got it'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Versatile Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Well, I'm sure I'll be criticized for this opinion but the whole thing seems a bit selfish to me. Did he give any thought to the child in this situation? So when Rod is 70, his kid is going to be 10. Is that fair? Basically, the kid is growing up without a father. And for what? So that Rod can prove he's still 'got it'? Good point... It's the 'rock'n roll' ethos Mature man...younger woman Often in cahoots I usually pity the children of 'stars' anyway How to live up to a dubious role model... V....(Serious for 5 mins) [unsure] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfpup Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Well, I'm sure I'll be criticized for this opinion but the whole thing seems a bit selfish to me. Did he give any thought to the child in this situation? So when Rod is 70, his kid is going to be 10. Is that fair? Basically, the kid is growing up without a father. And for what? So that Rod can prove he's still 'got it'? People are living longer these days. Who says he will die at 70 and leave the child fatherless? (BTW, he's 66 so if he dies at 70 the child would only be about 4). Another thought... perhaps his wife wanted another child (their second). Not everyone wants their children to grow up as only children (especially when the father is forecasted to die in 4 years). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Versatile Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Just wondering The name 'Rod' Is that a double entendre? <_< V Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Searcy Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Well, I'm sure I'll be criticized for this opinion but the whole thing seems a bit selfish to me. Did he give any thought to the child in this situation? So when Rod is 70, his kid is going to be 10. Is that fair? Basically, the kid is growing up without a father. And for what? So that Rod can prove he's still 'got it'? I kinda get what you're saying but it's not like these sort of guys actually raise their own kids anyway. They pay people to do that for them. ....and if Rod sucked the soul and life out of Beverly Sills work the way he does this classic I wouldn't be impressed with that either. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt2sOV3xd2k Mainly because I know what he's capable of .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Well heck, Rod doesn't have to play ball with the kid, he owns a soccer team...he will pay them to play with the boy!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daryl M Posted February 21, 2011 Share Posted February 21, 2011 I guess ole Rod can afford the child support... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.