Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

is it a shame to remove the pickguard?


Elmer

Recommended Posts

Well, title and topic description say's it all.

is it a shame to remove the pickguard? I want to see the guitar not a plastic plate...

The only things that can happen are scratches on the guitar ofcourse. I never play with a plectrum so scratches are more rare and I dont care if my guitar looks used. I play with it, it has to work! I want it mint when I buy it and I will always be carefull not to bump it against the cellars ceiling. But if minor scratches and little sympathetic changes in colour happen because of my play style, it is named character build.

 

I don't buy a guitar as investment, but as an instrument I use everyday.

 

Am I swearing now or are there more people who don't like the pickguard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pick guard looks good, however, obviously on the SG it stays lol but my les Paul I removed it because of the style of music , strumming and picking and overall playing style I do. I found it more comfortable with it off....all in all it comes down to personal taste and style I guess. [thumbup]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like most guitars better with the pickguard on, but I can't see any reason why you can't take it off if you like it better that way.

 

My Parker didn't come with a pickguard and that doesn't bother me, but I'd never take the guard off my Gibson ES-330 or my Epi Casino. But it's just a matter of taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

certainly some peeps think it is a shame to remove it...received a minus 2...gheghe

Yea, I don't get that. I fail to see any reasoning for the minuses.

 

Different guitar benefit more or less from having a pickgaurd or not having one, but the principle is the same in that it is a matter of choice and taste.

 

What kind of guitar is it anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I prefer the look with no scratch plate too.. the only one I have that still has one is the 60s Goldtop Tribute...

 

But like on this guitar I spotted on ebay, why would you want to cover that up :)

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/gibson-les-paul-standard-AMAZING-CUSTOM-FLAME-TOP-/200713714886?_trksid=p5197.m7&_trkparms=algo%3DLVI%26itu%3DUCI%26otn%3D3%26po%3DLVI%26ps%3D63%26clkid%3D6609899897396999876

 

And on my 2008 Standard (which may not be mine much longer :( ) The whole reason I got it wss for that finish.. No way I wanna cover that up.

DSC01258.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as looks go, I think for me it depends on the finish on the guitar. I kind of like the look of the pick guard on guitars with a finish where you can't see the wood grain, like a gold top or a solid finish like black. But if you can see the wood, like on the wine studio above or on a burst... no pick guard looks alot better to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biggest mistake I ever made was taking off the pickguard on my 1950s Harmony jazz guitar that wasn't - and isn't - all that bad a guitar at all.

 

Especially if you're not using a flatpick (plectrum), you may think you don't "need" the pickguard, and you may not, but you'd be surprised at how much the pickguard offers a physical "center" for your right hand.

 

So... all my others, electric or acoustic, have a pickguard - not counting the old Ovation AE boxes.

 

You might consider that Flamenco guitars traditionally have guards both above and below the soundhole.

 

m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...