Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

To pickguard or not to pickguard, that is the question


egoidealmusic

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, jedzep said:

Go ahead and pull it Murph. Then ship it to me and I'll return it in 6 mos with the top color all blended.  I offer this service to anyone else who'd like to mail me their guitars.
Yt3ggaR.jpg
9LxnA3m.jpg
nh8BP8d.jpg5KknV6D.jpg

Tan lines can be aggravating.

mask-tan.jpg

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, E-minor7 said:

".......... Mainly because the guitar itself is so pure and innocent....."

 

Em7,

How do you know what this guitar does behind closed doors?

Might be spending all its time living on the edge by hanging around with Martins or Taylors.

RBSinTo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way the guitar looks as is, but I too have a tendency to rest my pinky on the guitar top while picking and strumming which eventually leads to some marks there.  My solution, which was already mentioned above, was to put a clear pickguard on a guitar I had that didn't come with one.  The look of the guitar remained the same, but the top was protected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like pickguards.  Has less to do with function than looks.  They break up the monotony of the top particularly on a blondie.  While I have never added a pickguard which had not been there originally, I have replaced a few which were MIA or had already been replaced.  So, being these were all old guitars I had to stick with the original shape.   I tend to go with a dark tortoise shell because I am not a fan of much of what passes for firestripe these days.  It is more like tiger stripe as it lacks the subtlety the pickguards my three instruments made in the 1930s sport. 

As to shape though, I like the scatchplates Gibson went with on the CF100 from 1955 to 1959.  It was the first time since WWII Gibson went with a J35 style pickguard,   Looks good on an LG2 body although granted the CF100 was a cutaway.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"... because I am not a fan of much of what passes for firestripe these days. 

Agree -   I've got a tigerstripe - on my J45 sunburst.  I liked it when I got it - love it now.  Because it blends in and adds some interest.  The coloration is all brown, tan, etc. and the wavy lines are basically uniform.   The after market ones Ive seen - like the ones pictured here - have orange in them and are splotchy and meandering. Almost approaching  'modern art'.    Maybe that is 'fire stripe'  vs  'tiger stripe'.   I love the 'flame' in my maple grain SJ200,  but will pass on 'fire stripes' on pick guards.  Especially on a blonde face. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2022 at 4:25 PM, Dave F said:

Tan lines can be aggravating.

The mask mission above is great.

I did something similar to my TV Bird, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,   ,     , , , , , , , , , ,  , ,    ,,     ,      ,     ,       ,,,       ,        ,        ,  , ,,  ,    it took years for the direct sun to even it out. 

And today 5 summers later there's still a vague line left. . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2022 at 8:41 AM, jedzep said:

Go ahead and pull it Murph. Then ship it to me and I'll return it in 6 mos with the top color all blended.  I offer this service to anyone else who'd like to mail me their guitars.
 

Bwahahahaha.

That was great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, E-minor7 said:

The mask mission above is great.

I did something similar to my TV Bird, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,   ,     , , , , , , , , , ,  , ,    ,,     ,      ,     ,       ,,,       ,        ,        ,  , ,,  ,    it took years for the direct sun to even it out. 

And today 5 summers later there's still a vague line left. . 

You got away lucky.  While I do not know when they started and ended the practice, at one time Gibson applied pickguards I think with with acetone to bare wood and then sprayed a finish over them.  We had a second pickguard which Gibson had slapped onto my wife's 1960 J200 at some time when the guitar had been sent to Kalamazoo for repair removed and had to have the area refinished.  Even then you could still see a faint outline of where the pickguard had been. 

My '56 Epiphone FT79 though takes the prize for the biggest pain in the butt pickguard replacement.  Not only had the missing original been attached to bare wood but it was inset so flush with the top.  No margin for error when it came to replacing it.  

Edited by zombywoof
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2022 at 8:42 PM, Dave F said:

I had a Custom 0000-28 Martin all koa body shown below that I did not want to hide but didn't want to damage. I put a clear static guard that worked fine.

How's that Sarge? I mention Martin and Taylor on a Gibson thread 🙂

If interested, I have an unused batwing guard that came with a CJ165. 

 

martin M Koa

 

51586329003_12ac1af6d5_b.jpg51586328928_47e2d5ae58_b.jpg

 

https://www.zzounds.com/item--TAYSUPG?siid=285453&gclid=CjwKCAjwur-SBhB6EiwA5sKtjtSmH7HE21QzjnNuMtALCiArKT6oQTQxTna1RfXUr4qhSGhP7DQ50xoCyxYQAvD_BwE

TW-7304-PG-Static-Universal-04_821161-c2

 

I acquired a CJ-165 Rosewood a little while ago and it is a keeper! I absolutely love the smaller body as I am a smaller guy and it is LOUD! I didn't like the smaller jumbo proportions at first glance, but it has really started to grow on me  and the sound beats my Songwriter Deluxe (also rosewood) which is more balanced and quieter. I would love to complete the look with a batwing pickguard! I think the 165 pickguards are the same as the 185s, but it is absolutely impossible to source one and I don't know any websites that make one (I have tried GreasyGroove and Terrapin and it seems they are impossible to get a hold of). I would happily buy the CJ pickguard from you, Dave. 

 cj165.thumb.jpg.7d0a32bc555d2637adaad65bf92b5ba9.jpg

I do have a LG-2 AE and it is what they say - a miniature J-45 and looks the part and has many similarities to a J-45, minus the slope "thump".  I would say throw on a guard on there if you're a heavy picker and I personally think Gibson's look much better with their trademark guards. I threw on a Gibson teardrop guard on mine from an old G-45 Studio (just peeled it off with heat and then used 3M double side tape from eBay) rather than the batwing because there is too much space between the end of the fretboard on the AEs to make it look similar to all vintage examples. Also much easier to find a teardrop pickguard - I do have a batwing LG-2 pickguard template if you want it though. 

 

lg1-2.thumb.jpg.6b0eb97f08e6d7ea5be4b377a55fc0b7.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2022 at 6:16 AM, jedzep said:

Having owned 50's era models of this guitar, these, and really no guitar, should be subjected to strumming that's reckless enough to scar it.  At that point you would be driving it past it's tonal efficiency zone.  Maybe, keep your abused dread for 'bashing', and customize your strum attack a little.

I have this custom Greven firestripe guard matched to the wood on my '36 L00 restoration, but still hesitate attaching it.  Maybe a guard is useful to cover damage after the fact.


FLMK8lg.jpg
eoaN0VK.jpg

The pickguard on my 1956 SJ went right up to the edge of the soundhole.  While this may be aesthetically undesirable I have seen more than my fair share of old Gibsons where there was quite a bit of wear to the exposed area of the top adjacent to the soundhole and some where the wood had been worn to the point it had been thinned out enough to start breaking away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're all so beautiful without guards, no ifs about it for me.  And yes, I am serious and it works.
This '62 Martin had an awful double guard.  It took a whole spring thru fall to get it to blend, because you have to work around the hottest spells, not subjecting it to intense summer sun, but it came out real nice.
SZeyo4q.jpg
wPKCv1y.jpg
aikssZM.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did have to pull the bridge and do some overall sanding, then sprayed multiple coats of Mohawk flat/matte lacquer.  
 

What a sin it would be to lay a nasty batwing on that CJ-165, Will.  That much glue and plastic could alter the top response and tone too.

Edited by jedzep
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason your guitar hasn't got a pick guard is because the builder designed it to be without one.  The guitar is built for finger picking or light plectrum work. 

So may me this is the time for you to change your style to fit the guitar rather than changing the guitar to fit you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, fretplay said:

The reason your guitar hasn't got a pick guard is because the builder designed it to be without one.  The guitar is built for finger picking or light plectrum work. 

So may me this is the time for you to change your style to fit the guitar rather than changing the guitar to fit you.

The CJ165 I had came with the pickguard not applied to the guitar. In the past, Gibson has done this on a few models so you could have the option. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...