heymisterk Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 ...and hope fellow fans will do the same. To me, The Beatles will always be the best band ever, Alpha and Omega, lights out, the rest can pack 'em up and go home. Still even they have some songs I don't like. For me, I avoid the following: "Revolution 9" (the obvious choice; Lennon's biggest mistake, IHO) "Hello, Goodbye" (Blecch...c'mon, Paul...) "Baby You're a Rich Man" (Just plain don't like it.) "Can't Buy Me Love" (Again, just don't dig it.) I am obviously sticking to originals they wrote, but if you think they royally screwed up a good song written by someone else, by all means list it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirstMeasure Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 I have an odd perspective on the Beatles, especially thier early Pop stuff. My Mom and Dad never played Nursery Rhyme records or sang Itsy Bitsy Spider to us, they played Old Beatles, Doo Wop, and what was called "Oldies but Goodies" (Sea Cruise, Splish Splash, Chantilly Lace ect). So I can't really dislike any early Beatles, that would be like disliking Mother Goose or Uncle Remus. As for Post 1966 Beatles, I tend to like their normal stuff. Abby Road and Sgt Peppers and the like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigKahune Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 . Can't Please Everyone Everytime Oh wait, that's not one of their songs. B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tman Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 Well as a Beatles Fanatic too.... Don't mind baby you're a rich man, actually like it. Don't care for Sun King and, I want you (She's so heavy). Also some of the early Ringo and George stuff. Love everything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbreslauer Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 Not really a dislike, but after hearing "Let It Be...Naked", I can understand why Paul was so aggravated with Phil Spector... :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shnate McDuanus Posted March 19, 2011 Share Posted March 19, 2011 Don't get me started... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heymisterk Posted March 20, 2011 Author Share Posted March 20, 2011 Not really a dislike, but after hearing "Let It Be...Naked", I can understand why Paul was so aggravated with Phil Spector... :) Agreed. I never liked Long and Winding Road until I heard the version on Naked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonzoboy Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 I can't say there's any Beatles song that I dislike except for the Ohhhohhh ahhh part at the s beginning of When I get Home and I'm just not overly fond of that but the rest of the song's O.K.Rev. No. 9 can hardly be called a song,I mostly regard it as an experiment in sounds,I do know one thing though,it's pretty hard to try and dance to.BTW Let It Be Naked is the only way that album should have been released as Phil Specter made it an over-produced self indulgent fiasco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stein Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Don't get me started... I hear that, but here I go anyway; The covers they do of Chuck berry and any really are completely lackluster and don't make any sense to me. Why would you record and release a song that was nowhere near as good as the origional? If you don't get why I would say that, listen to any beatle cover of Chuck Berry and the listen to the Beatles one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SG FAN Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 I really like the Beatles, but I don't like any of their songs before Revolver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duane v Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 I started diggin the Beatles when I was introduced yo the Beatles 65 album. Then when Rubber Soul hit me, I was hooked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbreslauer Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 I started diggin the Beatles when I was introduced yo the Beatles 65 album. Then when Rubber Soul hit me, I was hooked rubber soul and revolver are my two favorites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieman15061 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 I hear that, but here I go anyway; The covers they do of Chuck berry and any really are completely lackluster and don't make any sense to me. Why would you record and release a song that was nowhere near as good as the origional? If you don't get why I would say that, listen to any beatle cover of Chuck Berry and the listen to the Beatles one. Interesting thoughts stiein. I think their versions of Rock And Roll Music and Twist and Shout blow away the originals. George's cover Roll Over Beethoven is rather lame but it gave him a song on an album and when your doing 4 a year ya gotta have material. McCartney tears it up on Little Richard's Long Tall Sally but in essence these were white British kids giving America back its music. The sales generated by the Beatles versions were a nice financial gain for the originals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieman15061 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff-7 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Liking the avatar cookie. I dislike very few Beatles songs, my dad was really into them so I grew up hearing it on vinyl all the time. Dad also got me into Pearl Jam haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieman15061 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpzggAVxLME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieman15061 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 If there is one i'm not fond of it's this cover. Blechhh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 The best cover of Please Mr. Postman.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saturn Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 I love most Beatles songs. I don't own every album, so I'm sure there are some obscure songs that I might not like as much. Out of their well known songs, I think "Yesterday" is my least favorite. i know it's considered one of the most iconic songs and all that, but to me it sounds simple and amaturish compared to some of their other stuff. With all the easy rhyming... Day Play Way Me Be etc.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Ever notice that in all the video of The Beatles from live concerts, there is something missing? Something every band, every singer would take for granted today? Monitor speakers! You try to play to a large crowd, live while they are shouting so loud you can't hear anything and do it without monitors, lets see how good you sound...Here are two clips of the same song from the same year...you will not see a monitor....they played with very crude and basic equipment...nothing like what we have today, or even a few years after they broke up. I think they did very well considering; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zH4WpCpAxY&feature=related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigh Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 As a major Beatle fan the only song I don't like is "You're Mother Should Know". Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duane v Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Ever notice that in all the video of The Beatles from live concerts, there is something missing? Something every band, every singer would take for granted today? Monitor speakers! You try to play to a large crowd, live while they are shouting so loud you can't hear anything and do it without monitors, lets see how good you sound...Here are two clips of the same song from the same year...you will not see a monitor....they played with very crude and basic equipment...nothing like what we have today, or even a few years after they broke up. I think they did very well considering; Beatles had a full blown monitor system when playing Shea Stadium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 Beatles had a full blown monitor system when playing Shea Stadium Yes they did. I also see that they had two mics on one stand on John's keyboard..but they didn't have monitors in many of the venues they played, even when they played Shea, you have to admit they had pretty crude equipment, one amp per player and their amps were mic'd into the stadium PA system, nothing like the walls of amps and stacked PA speakers that groups toured with just a few years later.. This is from 63' see any monitors? Two mics and three amps.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPJy05efcgE&feature=related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxson50 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 This is from 64' all they have are amps to monitor with. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnspiH4xLRw&feature=related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieman15061 Posted March 20, 2011 Share Posted March 20, 2011 This of course brings us back to Ringo who's impeccable timing kept the band together. The sound was often so bad that they would simply watch his head bob to stay in time and thats the truth,lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.