Jump to content
Gibson Brands Forums

Gibsons Pricing policy


sugarcool6

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Murph said:

Welcome to socialism.

I missed the part that was socialism.  The free market part?  Big money types owning and running manufacturing businesses cause they have too much cash to mind their own business?  This problem is as far from socialism as you can get.

Ten percent of you guys want anarchy and the other ninety percent want what they tell you to want. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, badbluesplayer said:

I missed the part that was socialism.  The free market part?  Big money types owning and running manufacturing businesses cause they have too much cash to mind their own business?  This problem is as far from socialism as you can get.

Ten percent of you guys want anarchy and the other ninety percent want what they tell you to want. 

!LOL!

I think we should stick to *****in about the price increases and leave it there.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, badbluesplayer said:

I missed the part that was socialism. 

When you keep printing money to give goods and services to people who don't actually earn them it creates inflation. Prices on goods and services go up, as the value of money goes down.

You truly don't understand this?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, 'Scales said:

Private equity company KKR (the owners of Gibson) would be giggling if they ever bothered to visit here. [laugh]

Those 90 year old investment bankers have no need to come to a guitar website. All they want is their money back, and a nap and their depends changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sgt. Pepper said:

Those 90 year old investment bankers have no need to come to a guitar website. All they want is their money back, and a nap and their depends changed.

No, I meant giggling at the idea that they might ever be considered part of a socialist establishment...they sure ain't that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Murph said:

Yep. And the only way to keep up with inflation is to raise prices as the value of money continues to fall.

I sold a house in Mesa, Az. in the 80's for 40K that sold a few years ago for 230K.

It's 40 years older.

So people want to sell stuff for more than they got it for if they can? This is new to me. I always leap on the first highest priced used guitar I can find. That way I know I got a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Murph said:

You missed the point. As usual.

The house was worth 40K in 1980. A new Mustang was 19K in 1980.

Because the dollar is losing value, the same house is worth 230K and a new Mustang is 55K.

It's not greed.

It's inflation.

average wage circa 1980 was about 14 K or less.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Murph said:

You missed the point. As usual.

The house was worth 40K in 1980. A new Mustang was 19K in 1980.

Because the dollar is losing value, the same house is worth 230K and a new Mustang is 55K.

It's not greed.

It's inflation.

And now they are not. Its called  - The way it goes.

Edited by Sgt. Pepper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many hours of your time working is required to purchase X is the thing. Over the years some things cost less hours of your labour and some cost more.

Now with people living to such old age a challenge arises...people still need things/services but many are perhaps not working for maybe 30 years?  Difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One factor not mentioned - the evil, greedy capitalists, once they get all the money they know they can use,  want something more elusive: Power and Control.   Those feed the money-inflated ego like steroids.   Sort of like the law of diminishing returns.  After you have five beachfront mansions - OK, ten - you are sated.  Ten Ferraris?  Build onto the garage...?  Nope.  You still feel a need for 'more', but not more money or 'worldly goods'.  So, Power and Control rush in to fill the vacuum.    That suggests 'freedom' needs to be eliminated. OR, re-defined for that 90% BBPlayer mentioned.   And, the only two ways to curtail freedom are with a gun or a pen.   I disagree, btw, with that '90%.   I'd guess it's only around 50% of the population (I'm thinking USA,  wouldn't presume to understand other countries with different histories, cultures and values).   But the scary part is - 50% or 90% - it doesn't matter. Because the 2 choices we are given every November - neither seems to have worked.    "Will my team get to 51% this go-round?"  Doesn't matter.   It's almost like we're being played.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, fortyearspickn said:

One factor not mentioned - the evil, greedy capitalists, once they get all the money they know they can use,  want something more elusive: Power and Control.   

Your exactly right. Why is Nacy Pelosi doing that job in DC for $xxxk. She and her husband own 4 houses in California (4), and I am sure none of them are small.  They are worth over 100 million. So money for her is nothing. Its the power she had or still has. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...